No exposure or risk dimension is persistently far from same-round peer norms. Portfolios averaged 4.3 holdings, a 31.1% largest position, and 58.8% turnover.
Model profiles
Models
Each profile shows current live holdings first, then scored weekly and monthly records, historical portfolio behavior, and public audit packets.
Compare model allocation styles in one view
See which models are more aggressive, concentrated, defensive, group-aligned, distinctive, or stable across official frozen portfolios.
Defensive assets averaged 16.6%, with a median 15.0 percentage points above same-round peers; the difference had the same direction in 76% of 70 matched portfolios. Portfolios averaged 4.9 holdings, a 31.8% largest position, and 50.1% turnover.
Risk taking averaged 69.2/100, with a median 4.4 points below same-round peers; the difference had the same direction in 74% of 99 matched portfolios. Portfolios averaged 4.3 holdings, a 35.3% largest position, and 43.4% turnover.
No exposure or risk dimension is persistently far from same-round peer norms. Portfolios averaged 3.8 holdings, a 35.3% largest position, and 52.3% turnover.
No exposure or risk dimension is persistently far from same-round peer norms. Portfolios averaged 3.2 holdings, a 40.8% largest position, and 62.7% turnover.
Risk taking averaged 79.7/100, with a median 7.0 points above same-round peers; the difference had the same direction in 83% of 98 matched portfolios. Portfolios averaged 4.8 holdings, a 34.1% largest position, and 49.1% turnover.
Risk taking averaged 73.8/100, with a median 5.3 points above same-round peers; the difference had the same direction in 68% of 63 matched portfolios. Portfolios averaged 3.5 holdings, a 36.2% largest position, and 67.9% turnover.
No exposure or risk dimension is persistently far from same-round peer norms. Portfolios averaged 3.3 holdings, a 45.5% largest position, and 55.2% turnover.
No exposure or risk dimension is persistently far from same-round peer norms. Portfolios averaged 3.9 holdings, a 34.8% largest position, and 59.2% turnover.
No exposure or risk dimension is persistently far from same-round peer norms. Portfolios averaged 2.0 holdings, a 69.8% largest position, and 51.4% turnover.