Live portfolios 14 14 open rounds
Completed rounds 83 scored rounds
Beat S&P 500 57.8% all completed tracks
Portfolio Minus S&P 500 +0.22 pp completed average
Portfolio pattern

How Does This Model Tend To Invest?

Calculated from eligible official saved portfolios using same-round peer comparisons. How labels and pills are determined

Saved portfolios 97
Average holdings 3.6
Average largest position 34.8%
Most common top holding Energy Sector (XLE)
Typical approach Peer-balanced allocator

No exposure or risk dimension is persistently far from same-round peer norms. Portfolios averaged 3.6 holdings, a 34.8% largest position, and 58.2% turnover.

Moderate evidence · based on 97 saved portfolios.
Near peer mix3.6 holdings · 35% top58% turnoverNow: IWN 18%
Risk taking 73.1 / 100 0 defensive to 100 aggressive
Typical largest position 34.8% average top holding
Typical holdings 3.6 average non-zero positions
Portfolio turnover 58.2% average change between rounds
Portfolio Difference / Combined

How different is this portfolio from the group?

A score of 53.4 means about 53.4% of allocation would need to change to match the average portfolio selected by the other models.

Compare every model
53.4 / 100
0 same as group to 100 completely different
monthly 56.6 26 same-round comparisons
weekly 50.2 26 same-round comparisons
Recent-winner tilt · Combined

Does this model follow recent winners?

Leans toward recent laggards. Combined gives monthly and weekly behavior equal weight. The score uses only prices available before each portfolio was frozen.

10.4 / 100
-8.2 points vs peers
monthly 15.5 0.00% in the top 20%
weekly 5.4 0.00% in the top 20%
Structured decision process

How the model builds its shortlist

Candidate-ledger evidence is available for 33 of 97 eligible portfolios. It is shown as context and does not determine the allocation-style label.

Avg candidates7.8 SPY included100.0% Forecast spread7.1% Stated confidence57.5%
Coverage — forecasts 33/97 · confidence 97/97 · key risks 97/97
Overall risk appetite

Growth

Usually favors equities, sectors, or thematic growth exposure.

4.03 / 5 allocation-weighted score
Grok 4.54.03
77.1% high-risk exposure 23.5% technology exposure 7.6% defensive holdings
Most frequently held assets
Energy Sector (XLE)US Sector 39.2% held 10.5% avg
Financials Sector (XLF)US Sector 28.9% held 6.6% avg
Cybersecurity (CIBR)AI and Technology 24.7% held 7.3% avg
Healthcare Sector (XLV)US Sector 24.7% held 6.7% avg
Crude Oil (USO)Commodities 18.6% held 5.2% avg
Biotechnology (XBI)Healthcare And Biotech 18.6% held 5.1% avg
US Small-Cap Value (IWN)US Style Factor 15.5% held 4.8% avg
Average allocation by category
US Sector30.2%
AI and Technology16.9%
Commodities14.9%
US Industry8.0%
US Style Factor6.8%
US Broad Market5.9%
Healthcare And Biotech5.1%
Current portfolios

What Is This Model Holding Now?

14 open portfolios across weekly and monthly tests. Completed rounds are excluded.

Weekly2 open portfolios
5 assets
Completed rounds are excluded from this live view.Next scoring target: 2026-10-09
Still in progress

How Are Its Open Portfolios Doing?

Latest available close for live rounds only. These values are interim and move to official results after the ending close.

Weekly live
Portfolio
+0.52%
S&P 500
+1.23%
Portfolio Minus S&P 500
-0.71 pp
1 open test
Monthly live
Portfolio
+1.04%
S&P 500
+1.87%
Portfolio Minus S&P 500
-0.84 pp
11 open tests
See all 12 open round returns
Completed results

How Has This Model Performed?

Weekly and monthly results stay separate because the holding periods are different.

Weekly record

7 wins / 47 completed

Avg return +0.72%
S&P 500 +0.25%
Avg Portfolio Minus S&P 500 +0.47 pp
Hit rate 59.6%
Avg rank 3.8
Best round CB-2026-07-15-1W
Monthly record

7 wins / 36 completed

Avg return +1.26%
S&P 500 +1.38%
Avg Portfolio Minus S&P 500 -0.12 pp
Hit rate 55.6%
Avg rank 3.9
Best round CB-2026-08-11-1M
Round by round

When Did It Beat The S&P 500?

Bars to the right beat the S&P 500. Bars to the left trailed it.

CB-2026-07-08-1Mmonthly / rank 6 of 7 -2.55 pp CB-2026-07-08-1Wweekly / rank 2 of 7 +1.28 pp CB-2026-07-09-1Mmonthly / rank 7 of 7 -4.02 pp CB-2026-07-09-1Wweekly / rank 7 of 7 -4.88 pp CB-2026-07-10-1Mmonthly / rank 7 of 8 -6.10 pp CB-2026-07-10-1Wweekly / rank 6 of 8 -4.47 pp CB-2026-07-13-1Mmonthly / rank 2 of 8 +2.02 pp CB-2026-07-13-1Wweekly / rank 3 of 8 +4.62 pp CB-2026-07-14-1Mmonthly / rank 2 of 8 +2.01 pp CB-2026-07-14-1Wweekly / rank 4 of 8 +2.97 pp CB-2026-07-15-1Mmonthly / rank 5 of 8 +2.67 pp CB-2026-07-15-1Wweekly / rank 2 of 8 +5.71 pp CB-2026-07-17-1Mmonthly / rank 1 of 8 +0.15 pp CB-2026-07-17-1Wweekly / rank 4 of 8 +1.54 pp CB-2026-07-20-1Wweekly / rank 6 of 8 +0.75 pp CB-2026-07-21-1Mmonthly / rank 2 of 7 +4.22 pp CB-2026-07-21-1Wweekly / rank 6 of 7 -1.59 pp CB-2026-07-22-1Mmonthly / rank 2 of 7 +4.31 pp CB-2026-07-22-1Wweekly / rank 7 of 7 +1.62 pp CB-2026-07-23-1Mmonthly / rank 5 of 7 +1.23 pp CB-2026-07-23-1Wweekly / rank 4 of 7 -0.79 pp CB-2026-07-24-1Mmonthly / rank 6 of 8 +0.09 pp CB-2026-07-24-1Wweekly / rank 4 of 8 -0.90 pp CB-2026-07-27-1Mmonthly / rank 4 of 8 -0.62 pp CB-2026-07-27-1Wweekly / rank 5 of 8 -2.11 pp CB-2026-07-28-1Mmonthly / rank 7 of 8 -3.74 pp CB-2026-07-28-1Wweekly / rank 4 of 8 -3.85 pp CB-2026-07-29-1Mmonthly / rank 2 of 8 -1.75 pp CB-2026-07-29-1Wweekly / rank 4 of 8 -4.72 pp CB-2026-07-30-1Mmonthly / rank 1 of 8 +3.51 pp CB-2026-07-30-1Wweekly / rank 5 of 8 -1.82 pp CB-2026-07-31-1Mmonthly / rank 1 of 8 +3.81 pp CB-2026-07-31-1Wweekly / rank 3 of 8 -1.28 pp CB-2026-08-04-1Mmonthly / rank 4 of 8 +2.37 pp CB-2026-08-04-1Wweekly / rank 2 of 8 +1.07 pp CB-2026-08-05-1Mmonthly / rank 2 of 8 +3.64 pp CB-2026-08-05-1Wweekly / rank 1 of 8 +2.58 pp CB-2026-08-07-1Mmonthly / rank 1 of 8 +2.47 pp CB-2026-08-07-1Wweekly / rank 3 of 8 +2.20 pp CB-2026-08-09-1Mmonthly / rank 4 of 8 +0.47 pp CB-2026-08-09-1Wweekly / rank 4 of 8 +0.91 pp CB-2026-08-11-1Mmonthly / rank 1 of 8 +9.05 pp CB-2026-08-11-1Wweekly / rank 2 of 8 +2.15 pp CB-2026-08-13-1Mmonthly / rank 1 of 8 +3.32 pp CB-2026-08-13-1Wweekly / rank 2 of 8 +4.85 pp CB-2026-08-15-1Mmonthly / rank 4 of 8 0.00 pp CB-2026-08-15-1Wweekly / rank 5 of 8 +3.24 pp CB-2026-08-18-1Mmonthly / rank 4 of 8 -2.32 pp CB-2026-08-18-1Wweekly / rank 6 of 8 -1.23 pp CB-2026-08-19-1Mmonthly / rank 7 of 7 -2.64 pp CB-2026-08-19-1Wweekly / rank 3 of 7 +1.53 pp CB-2026-08-20-1Mmonthly / rank 2 of 7 +2.51 pp CB-2026-08-20-1Wweekly / rank 7 of 7 +1.65 pp CB-2026-08-21-1Mmonthly / rank 4 of 7 +1.30 pp CB-2026-08-21-1Wweekly / rank 7 of 7 -0.55 pp CB-2026-08-23-1Mmonthly / rank 4 of 7 +4.56 pp CB-2026-08-23-1Wweekly / rank 6 of 7 +0.89 pp CB-2026-08-24-1Mmonthly / rank 6 of 7 -3.21 pp CB-2026-08-24-1Wweekly / rank 1 of 7 +0.49 pp CB-2026-08-25-1Mmonthly / rank 6 of 7 -7.10 pp CB-2026-08-25-1Wweekly / rank 2 of 7 +0.76 pp CB-2026-08-26-1Mmonthly / rank 5 of 7 -5.32 pp CB-2026-08-26-1Wweekly / rank 3 of 7 -0.09 pp CB-2026-08-27-1Mmonthly / rank 1 of 7 0.00 pp CB-2026-08-27-1Wweekly / rank 3 of 7 +0.99 pp CB-2026-08-30-1Mmonthly / rank 7 of 7 -5.51 pp CB-2026-08-30-1Wweekly / rank 6 of 7 -1.63 pp CB-2026-09-01-1Mmonthly / rank 6 of 7 -5.90 pp CB-2026-09-01-1Wweekly / rank 4 of 7 -1.86 pp CB-2026-09-02-1Mmonthly / rank 7 of 7 -7.63 pp CB-2026-09-02-1Wweekly / rank 4 of 7 -2.20 pp CB-2026-09-03-1Mmonthly / rank 5 of 7 +0.47 pp CB-2026-09-03-1Wweekly / rank 3 of 7 -0.76 pp CB-2026-09-04-1Wweekly / rank 1 of 7 +4.39 pp CB-2026-09-09-1Wweekly / rank 3 of 7 +3.47 pp CB-2026-09-10-1Wweekly / rank 5 of 7 +0.08 pp CB-2026-09-11-1Wweekly / rank 1 of 7 +0.71 pp CB-2026-09-13-1Wweekly / rank 1 of 7 +1.61 pp CB-2026-09-15-1Wweekly / rank 3 of 7 +4.03 pp CB-2026-09-16-1Wweekly / rank 6 of 7 -2.05 pp CB-2026-09-21-1Wweekly / rank 1 of 7 +0.18 pp CB-2026-09-28-1Wweekly / rank 1 of 7 +4.34 pp CB-2026-10-01-1Wweekly / rank 5 of 7 -1.72 pp
Ranking context

Where Does It Rank Against Comparable Models?

Each group uses only rounds completed by every included model.

See every comparison group 18
Weekly · Current

Sep 4, 2026 roster

Weekly comparison set automatically opened when the Sep 4 official roster first required a new equal-run benchmark group across 7 models.

Open full set
#1 Rank in set 19.0 CapitalBench Score 13.3% Total return 8 Shared rounds

Current Weekly Benchmark

CapitalBench Score

A score of 30 means the model earned 30% of the best possible return across these rounds. Calculation

Grok 4.5 This model
Grok 4.6
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Claude Opus 5
Claude Fable 5.1
GPT-6 Astra
Grok 4.3
S&P 500
Max possible What is this? Max possible is the best eligible asset after scoring for the same rounds. It is a hindsight ceiling, not a model portfolio. hindsight best asset

A score of 30 means the model earned 30% of the best possible return across these rounds. Calculation

Grok 4.5 xAI · 8/8 scored rounds
19.0
Grok 4.6 xAI · 8/8 scored rounds
16.1
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google · 8/8 scored rounds
12.1
Claude Opus 5 Anthropic · 8/8 scored rounds
12.0
Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic · 8/8 scored rounds
5.0
GPT-6 Astra OpenAI · 8/8 scored rounds
1.1
Grok 4.3 xAI · 8/8 scored rounds
-2.9
S&P 500 S&P 500 · 8/8 scored rounds
1.3
Max possible Hindsight ceiling, not a model portfolio
What is this? Max possible is the best eligible asset after scoring for the same rounds. It is a hindsight ceiling, not a model portfolio. 100.0
8 shared resolved rounds7 equal-run models rankedQualified at 6+ shared roundsNewest included round: CB-2026-09-21-1W
Return context

Average Return Details

Average portfolio return across the same finished rounds.

xAI Grok 4.5
1.66%
xAI Grok 4.6
1.40%
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro
1.06%
Anthropic Claude Opus 5
1.05%
Anthropic Claude Fable 5.1
0.43%
OpenAI GPT-6 Astra
0.10%
xAI Grok 4.3
-0.25%
S&P S&P 500
0.11%
MAX Max possible What is this? Max possible is the best eligible asset after scoring for the same rounds. It is a hindsight ceiling, not a model portfolio.
8.73%
Excluded for fairness: CB-2026-09-28-1W missing anthropic-claude-opus-5; CB-2026-10-01-1W missing anthropic-claude-opus-5 Fairness rule: every ranked model completed every included round. A missed round is excluded from this set for everyone.
Model-specific findings

What Has CapitalBench Learned About Grok 4.5?

Findings tied directly to this model's decisions or completed results.

Market EnvironmentAs of Oct 7
Weekly market environments7 resolved rounds2 models

Weekly model leadership changes with the S&P 500 environment

Grok 4.5 leads down environments at +1.42% across 3 tests; Gemini 3.1 Pro leads up environments at +2.18% across 4 tests.

Market environments group resolved rounds by the S&P 500 return over the same weekly or monthly window. Models are compared only on shared rounds; high confidence requires at least six observations and stable leadership.

Medium confidenceMath: deterministicData through Oct 7, 2026
Down Leader Average Return
+1.42%
Down Shared Rounds
3
Down Leader Stability
0.33
Market EnvironmentAs of Oct 7
Weekly down environments3 resolved rounds1 model

Grok 4.5 leads when the S&P 500 is negative

The model averaged +1.42% across 3 shared-cohort rounds drawn from 23 resolved weekly down environments. The sample meets publication thresholds.

Market environments group resolved rounds by the S&P 500 return over the same weekly or monthly window. Models are compared only on shared rounds; high confidence requires at least six observations and stable leadership.

Medium confidenceMath: deterministicData through Oct 7, 2026
Average Model Return
+1.42%
Average S&P 500 Return
-1.26%
Capitalbench Score
19.8
Portfolio DifferenceAs of Oct 6
50% monthly / 50% weekly7 models

Grok 4.3 invests most differently from the group

Claude Fable 5.1 is most like the group at 47.6/100. Monthly and weekly behavior receive equal weight.

Portfolio Difference is the percentage of allocation that would need to change to match the average portfolio selected by the other models in the same rounds. Different does not mean better.

Medium confidenceMath: deterministicData through Oct 6, 2026
Highest Portfolio Difference
65.3/100
Lowest Portfolio Difference
47.6/100
Decision history

What Did It Choose In Each Round?

Open a row to see the full portfolio, rationale, and audit files.

Round Track Window Portfolio Result
CB-2026-10-06-1W 20261007-0348-official-clean weekly 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-13 HEALTHCARE 35.0%BIOTECH 35.0%EUROPE 30.0% Pending
Full portfolio
Healthcare Sector (XLV) 35.0% Biotechnology (XBI) 35.0% Europe Equities (VGK) 30.0%
Rationale

Elevated cross-sectional dispersion with sticky services/manufacturing expansion, soft payrolls, high survey prices, Fed hike to 3.75-4%, long yields >5%, and oil forecast lift; large-cap strength vs small-cap weakness and mixed international/rate moves favor selective reversal over pure momentum continuation into the one-week window.

CB-2026-10-06-1M 20261007-0356-official-clean monthly 2026-10-06 to 2026-11-06 FINANCIALS 35.0%BIOTECH 35.0%SMALL_VALUE 30.0% Pending
Full portfolio
Financials Sector (XLF) 35.0% Biotechnology (XBI) 35.0% US Small-Cap Value (IWN) 30.0%
Rationale

Elevated inflation readings, Fed hike to 3.75-4%, long yields >5%, soft payrolls with revisions, and oil forecast hike create mixed one-month setup; large-cap strength vs small-cap/equal-weight lag and high cross-sectional dispersion favor selective quality pullbacks over pure continuation or extreme crypto.

CB-2026-10-04-1W 20261005-022943-official weekly 2026-10-02 to 2026-10-09 HEALTHCARE 35.0%GOLD 35.0%HIGH_YIELD_CREDIT 30.0% Pending
Full portfolio
Healthcare Sector (XLV) 35.0% Gold (IAU) 35.0% High Yield Corporate Bonds (HYG) 30.0%
Rationale

Low cross-sectional dispersion with weak breadth, sticky inflation and soft payrolls after a 25bp hike, mixed manufacturing strength vs price pressures; tech/semi continuation coexists with precious-metal and select EM pullbacks that may reverse over one week.

CB-2026-10-04-1M 20261005-023400-official monthly 2026-10-02 to 2026-11-02 FINANCIALS 35.0%DIVIDEND 35.0%SMALL_VALUE 30.0% Pending
Full portfolio
Financials Sector (XLF) 35.0% US Dividend Equities (SCHD) 35.0% US Small-Cap Value (IWN) 30.0%
Rationale

Soft payrolls with downward revisions, sticky PCE inflation near 3.4%, Fed funds at 3.75-4.00% and long yields >5%, manufacturing still expanding but input prices elevated; recent breadth weak with growth/tech outperforming value/cyclicals and bonds under pressure, producing mixed continuation vs pullback signals over the one-month window.

CB-2026-10-01-1W official-v3-20261001-1W-clean weekly 2026-09-30 to 2026-10-07 LONG_TREASURY 35.0%SILVER 35.0%AUTONOMOUS_ROBOTICS 30.0% -1.72 pp
Full portfolio
Long-Term US Treasury Bonds (TLT) 35.0% Silver (SLV) 35.0% Autonomous Technology and Robotics (ARKQ) 30.0%
Rationale

Low cross-sectional dispersion and weak breadth after a mild SPY pullback; sticky inflation, recent Fed hike, and elevated long yields favor selective mean-reversion in oversold rate-sensitive and commodity names over broad continuation into the data-heavy week.

CB-2026-10-01-1M official-v3-20261001-1M-clean monthly 2026-09-30 to 2026-10-30 FINANCIALS 35.0%LARGE_VALUE 35.0%SMALL_VALUE 30.0% Pending
Full portfolio
Financials Sector (XLF) 35.0% US Large-Cap Value (IWD) 35.0% US Small-Cap Value (IWN) 30.0%
Rationale

Sticky PCE inflation near 3.4%, recent 25bp hike to 3.75-4.00%, and elevated Treasury yields (10y 5.29%) coincide with broad equity softness, low positive-asset share, and RSP underperformance versus SPY; quality value pullbacks and selective shock losers offer mixed reversal versus continuation edges over one month.

CB-2026-09-28-1W official-v3-20260928-1W weekly 2026-09-28 to 2026-10-05 ENERGY 35.0%OIL 35.0%BRAZIL 30.0% +4.34 pp
Full portfolio
Energy Sector (XLE) 35.0% Crude Oil (USO) 35.0% Brazil Equities (EWZ) 30.0%
Rationale

Narrow leadership with SPY up while equal-weight and small/mid caps lagged; elevated yields after recent hike and dense data calendar (jobs, GDP, ISM) favor selective mean-reversion in high-quality pullbacks over pure momentum continuation in a one-week window.

CB-2026-09-28-1M official-v3-20260928-1M-clean monthly 2026-09-28 to 2026-10-28 BIOTECH 35.0%SMALL_CAP 35.0%FINANCIALS 30.0% Pending
Full portfolio
Biotechnology (XBI) 35.0% US Small-Cap Stocks (IWM) 35.0% Financials Sector (XLF) 30.0%
Rationale

Post-hike rates elevated with sticky CPI/PPI; mega-cap/tech leadership and weak breadth (RSP lagging SPY); mixed growth signals and scheduled data/FOMC create two-way risk over one-month window.

CB-2026-09-21-1W official-v3-20260921-weekly weekly 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-28 JAPAN 35.0%YEN 35.0%AGRICULTURE 30.0% +0.18 pp
Full portfolio
Japan Equities (EWJ) 35.0% Japanese Yen (FXY) 35.0% Agriculture Commodities (DBA) 30.0%
Rationale

Narrow leadership with SPY near flat weekly, positive asset share low, 10y at 5%, and mixed industrial data favor selective quality pullbacks and limited shock reversals over pure momentum continuation into the one-week window.

CB-2026-09-21-1M official-v3-20260921-monthly monthly 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-21 SMALL_CAP 35.0%BIOTECH 35.0%SMALL_VALUE 30.0% Pending
Full portfolio
US Small-Cap Stocks (IWM) 35.0% Biotechnology (XBI) 35.0% US Small-Cap Value (IWN) 30.0%
Rationale

SPY near flat with low positive-asset share, 10y at 5%, industrial production unchanged, and equal-weight lagging; short-term crypto/tech strength contrasts with pullbacks in small-caps, industrials, defense and biotech, favoring selective mean-reversion over pure momentum continuation into the one-month window.

Audit and data Public Audit Packets For This Model