Weekly benchmark

Latest Result And Full Weekly History

Gemini 3.1 Pro led the latest weekly round at 4.62%, compared with 1.26% for the S&P 500. Grok 4.3 leads the full weekly history with a CapitalBench Score of -1.7.

2026-07-08 close to 2026-07-15 close
Top model Gemini 3.1 Pro
Cumulative leader Grok 4.3
Completed weekly rounds 28
Top model return 4.62%
S&P 500 1.26%
Portfolio Minus S&P 500 +3.36 pp
CapitalBench Score 43.0 vs max possible · portfolio 4.62% · best asset 10.76%
CapitalBench Score

Main Benchmark Scale

CapitalBench Score compares each model portfolio with the best eligible asset in hindsight for the same weekly window. Max possible is always 100.

Score calculation
Latest round

Latest Round CapitalBench Score

CapitalBench Score compares each portfolio with the best eligible asset in hindsight for this exact weekly window. Max possible is 100.

Max possible S&P 500 Model portfolios
Max possible ETHA · score 100
100.0 10.76%
S&P 500 Benchmark reference
11.7 1.26%
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
43.0 4.62%
Grok 4.5 xAI
23.7 2.55%
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
13.4 1.44%
Grok 4.3 xAI
9.7 1.04%
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
3.7 0.39%
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
1.8 0.20%
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
-1.6 -0.17%
Weekly track context

Cumulative Weekly Results

Models have beaten the S&P 500 in 15/28 completed weekly rounds and 55/147 model-round observations. At least one model beat the S&P 500 in the latest completed weekly round.

Open full weekly history
Completed rounds 28
Full-history leader Grok 4.3 -1.7 score
S&P 500 score 1.5
Avg model return -0.55%
Avg vs S&P -0.68 pp
Model beat observations 55/147
Weekly history trend

CapitalBench Score By Completed Weekly Round

Max possible is fixed at 100. The chart compares S&P 500, the top model, and the average model score in each completed weekly round.

Max possible Top model Average model S&P 500
-250.0 0.0 50.0 100.0 CB-2026-05-24-1W: top model GPT-5.5 scored 38.9 CB-2026-05-24-1W: average model score 28.1 CB-2026-05-24-1W: S&P 500 score 11.1 May 29 05-24-1W CB-2026-05-27-1W: top model GPT-5.5 scored 48.4 CB-2026-05-27-1W: average model score 45.6 CB-2026-05-27-1W: S&P 500 score 10.5 Jun 2 05-27-1W CB-2026-05-28-1W: top model Gemini 3.1 Pro scored 85.1 CB-2026-05-28-1W: average model score 67.1 CB-2026-05-28-1W: S&P 500 score 7.1 Jun 4 05-28-1W CB-2026-05-29-1W: top model Claude Opus 4.8 scored -150.0 CB-2026-05-29-1W: average model score -176.1 CB-2026-05-29-1W: S&P 500 score -82.2 Jun 5 05-29-1W CB-2026-06-01-1W: top model Claude Opus 4.8 scored -143.8 CB-2026-06-01-1W: average model score -195.3 CB-2026-06-01-1W: S&P 500 score -82.2 Jun 5 06-01-1W CB-2026-06-02-1W: top model Claude Opus 4.8 scored -100.5 CB-2026-06-02-1W: average model score -210.1 CB-2026-06-02-1W: S&P 500 score -78.3 Jun 8 06-02-1W CB-2026-06-03-1W: top model Claude Opus 4.8 scored -128.6 CB-2026-06-03-1W: average model score -155.7 CB-2026-06-03-1W: S&P 500 score -53.1 Jun 9 06-03-1W CB-2026-06-05-1W: top model Claude Opus 4.7 scored 7.1 CB-2026-06-05-1W: average model score 1.1 CB-2026-06-05-1W: S&P 500 score 4.5 Jun 12 06-05-1W CB-2026-06-08-1W: top model Claude Opus 4.7 scored 12.7 CB-2026-06-08-1W: average model score -0.8 CB-2026-06-08-1W: S&P 500 score 15.2 Jun 15 06-08-1W CB-2026-06-09-1W: top model Grok 4.3 scored 6.6 CB-2026-06-09-1W: average model score 2.4 CB-2026-06-09-1W: S&P 500 score 15.2 Jun 16 06-09-1W CB-2026-06-12-1W: top model Claude Fable 5 scored 25.5 CB-2026-06-12-1W: average model score 3.5 CB-2026-06-12-1W: S&P 500 score 12.0 Jun 18 06-12-1W CB-2026-06-13-1W: top model GPT-5.5 scored 61.1 CB-2026-06-13-1W: average model score 35.9 CB-2026-06-13-1W: S&P 500 score 6.1 Jun 18 06-13-1W CB-2026-06-15-1W: top model GPT-5.5 scored 58.1 CB-2026-06-15-1W: average model score 38.2 CB-2026-06-15-1W: S&P 500 score -16.1 Jun 22 06-15-1W CB-2026-06-16-1W: top model Grok 4.3 scored -2.5 CB-2026-06-16-1W: average model score -18.9 CB-2026-06-16-1W: S&P 500 score -22.7 Jun 23 06-16-1W CB-2026-06-17-1W: top model Grok 4.3 scored 7.9 CB-2026-06-17-1W: average model score -13.0 CB-2026-06-17-1W: S&P 500 score -10.5 Jun 24 06-17-1W CB-2026-06-18-1W: top model Claude Opus 4.8 scored -27.7 CB-2026-06-18-1W: average model score -34.9 CB-2026-06-18-1W: S&P 500 score -21.3 Jun 25 06-18-1W CB-2026-06-22-1W: top model Claude Opus 4.8 scored -17.2 CB-2026-06-22-1W: average model score -37.5 CB-2026-06-22-1W: S&P 500 score -5.3 Jun 29 06-22-1W CB-2026-06-23-1W: top model GPT-5.5 scored 58.6 CB-2026-06-23-1W: average model score 52.4 CB-2026-06-23-1W: S&P 500 score 23.6 Jun 30 06-23-1W CB-2026-06-24-1W: top model Claude Opus 4.8 scored 25.8 CB-2026-06-24-1W: average model score 19.2 CB-2026-06-24-1W: S&P 500 score 19.4 Jul 1 06-24-1W CB-2026-06-25-1W: top model Grok 4.3 scored 36.2 CB-2026-06-25-1W: average model score 11.9 CB-2026-06-25-1W: S&P 500 score 13.7 Jul 2 06-25-1W CB-2026-06-26-1W: top model Grok 4.3 scored 23.0 CB-2026-06-26-1W: average model score 16.9 CB-2026-06-26-1W: S&P 500 score 26.6 Jul 2 06-26-1W CB-2026-06-29-1W: top model Claude Opus 4.8 scored 2.5 CB-2026-06-29-1W: average model score -8.6 CB-2026-06-29-1W: S&P 500 score 13.0 Jul 6 06-29-1W CB-2026-06-30-1W: top model Claude Opus 4.7 scored -20.3 CB-2026-06-30-1W: average model score -29.5 CB-2026-06-30-1W: S&P 500 score 0.9 Jul 7 06-30-1W CB-2026-07-01-1W: top model Grok 4.3 scored 25.0 CB-2026-07-01-1W: average model score 9.7 CB-2026-07-01-1W: S&P 500 score -0.6 Jul 8 07-01-1W CB-2026-07-02-1W: top model Gemini 3.1 Pro scored 3.2 CB-2026-07-02-1W: average model score -10.8 CB-2026-07-02-1W: S&P 500 score 19.2 Jul 9 07-02-1W CB-2026-07-06-1W: top model Grok 4.3 scored -12.7 CB-2026-07-06-1W: average model score -20.2 CB-2026-07-06-1W: S&P 500 score -2.2 Jul 13 07-06-1W CB-2026-07-07-1W: top model GPT-5.5 scored 41.0 CB-2026-07-07-1W: average model score 9.0 CB-2026-07-07-1W: S&P 500 score 5.3 Jul 14 07-07-1W CB-2026-07-08-1W: top model Gemini 3.1 Pro scored 43.0 CB-2026-07-08-1W: average model score 13.4 CB-2026-07-08-1W: S&P 500 score 11.7 Jul 15 07-08-1W
Investor readout

What This Weekly Round Shows

This section summarizes the benchmark-relative result, model crowding, and the hindsight asset that set the maximum possible return for the round.

Benchmark result Gemini 3.1 Pro +3.36 pp

Top model return 4.62% vs S&P 500 1.26%.

Model average 1.44%

Average model portfolio finished +0.18 pp versus S&P 500.

Most crowded model exposures
Energy Sector (XLE) 25% avg Financials Sector (XLF) 21.4% avg Healthcare Sector (XLV) 16.4% avg Crude Oil (USO) 14.3% avg
What worked in hindsight
Ethereum ETF (ETHA) 10.76% Crude Oil (USO) 8.17% Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) 4.48%
What hurt the model portfolios
Healthcare Sector (XLV) -2.47% Biotechnology (XBI) -4.14% Utilities Sector (XLU) -0.31%
Official weekly result history

Browse Weekly Official Results

Move backward or forward through completed weekly rounds without leaving the weekly results page.

Weekly result1 of 28
Weekly official result

Weekly result scored Jul 15

Same-window returns, ranked after final prices.

Scored
Model portfolios S&P 500 benchmark Maximum possible return
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Grok 4.5
GPT-5.5
Grok 4.3
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Fable 5
S&P 500
ETHA Ethereum ETF
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
4.62%
Grok 4.5 xAI
2.55%
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
1.44%
Grok 4.3 xAI
1.04%
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
0.39%
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
0.20%
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
-0.17%
S&P 500 Benchmark
1.26%
ETHA Ethereum ETF - Hindsight best asset
10.76%
Portfolio context

Shows each model's saved portfolio weights.

Model portfolios

Ranked in the same order as the chart.

1
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Crude Oil (USO) 40% Energy (XLE) 30% Financials (XLF) 30%
2
Grok 4.5 xAI
Crude Oil (USO) 30% Energy (XLE) 25% Biotechnology (XBI) 20% Financials (XLF) 15% Value (IWD) 10%
3
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
Crude Oil (USO) 30% Energy (XLE) 20% Biotechnology (XBI) 25% Semiconductors (SMH) 15% Healthcare (XLV) 10%
4
Grok 4.3 xAI
Energy (XLE) 40% Financials (XLF) 35% Healthcare (XLV) 25%
5
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Healthcare (XLV) 25% Financials (XLF) 25% Energy (XLE) 20% Utilities (XLU) 15% T-Bills (BIL) 15%
6
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Healthcare (XLV) 30% Financials (XLF) 25% Energy (XLE) 20% Low Vol (SPLV) 15% Utilities (XLU) 10%
7
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Healthcare (XLV) 25% Energy (XLE) 20% Financials (XLF) 20% Biotechnology (XBI) 15% Value (IWD) 20%
Reference points

Not model portfolios.

S&P 500 Benchmark

Benchmark return over the same scoring window

ETHA Ethereum ETF - Hindsight best asset

100% Ethereum ETF (ETHA) hindsight ceiling

Official scored round

Weekly result scored Jul 15

Audit ID: CB-2026-07-08-1W

ScoredJul 15WindowJul 8 to Jul 15Models7Asset choices70LeaderGemini 3.1 ProHorizonWeekly
Result insights

What The Latest Weekly Result Shows

Context generated from the scored weekly round, including consensus performance, oracle comparison, and benchmark difficulty.

Consensus PerformanceJul 8-Jul 15

AI consensus portfolio scored 13.4 versus the oracle

If the weekly model allocations were averaged into one consensus portfolio, it returned +1.44% versus +1.26% for the S&P 500 and +10.76% for the hindsight best asset.

Consensus means the average of model allocations in the same round. CapitalBench Score compares that return with the hindsight-best eligible asset for that exact scoring window.

High confidenceMath: deterministicData through Jul 15, 2026
Consensus Portfolio Return
+1.44%
Average Model Return
+1.44%
Consensus Capitalbench Score
13.4
Why it matters

The consensus portfolio tests whether the combined AI view is more useful than any single model's portfolio or the S&P 500 benchmark.

Benchmark DifficultyJul 8-Jul 15

Weekly round had +16.82% asset dispersion

The best scored asset returned +10.76%, the worst returned -6.06%, and +68.57% of the universe was positive. The S&P 500 ranked 22 out of 70 options.

Asset dispersion is the gap between the best and worst eligible assets in the same round. Wider dispersion makes missed allocation choices more costly.

High confidenceMath: deterministicData through Jul 15, 2026
Oracle Return
+10.8%
Worst Asset Return
-6.06%
Positive Universe Share
+68.6%
Why it matters

Benchmark difficulty matters because model scores should be interpreted against the opportunity set and the market window they faced.

Oracle ComparisonJul 8-Jul 15

Models missed the weekly oracle asset

The hindsight best asset was Ethereum ETF (ETHA) at +10.76%. 0 of 7 models held it, with +0.00% average allocation.

Oracle means the best eligible asset in hindsight for that round. Models do not know it when portfolios are frozen.

High confidenceMath: deterministicData through Jul 15, 2026
Oracle Asset Holder Count
0
Average Oracle Asset Allocation
0.00%
Why it matters

This shows whether models identified the eventual best asset before scoring, even when portfolio weights were too small to fully capture the oracle return.

Detailed scores

Weekly Score Tables

Switch between the latest completed weekly round and cumulative weekly history. All cumulative rows are derived from resolved weekly run files.

CapitalBench Score audit

Score Formula

100 matches the maximum possible return; negative scores preserve the size of a loss.

Gemini 3.1 Pro score 43.0 · portfolio 4.62% · max possible 10.76%: Ethereum ETF (ETHA) Grok 4.5 score 23.7 · portfolio 2.55% · max possible 10.76%: Ethereum ETF (ETHA) GPT-5.5 score 13.4 · portfolio 1.44% · max possible 10.76%: Ethereum ETF (ETHA) Grok 4.3 score 9.7 · portfolio 1.04% · max possible 10.76%: Ethereum ETF (ETHA) Claude Opus 4.8 score 3.7 · portfolio 0.39% · max possible 10.76%: Ethereum ETF (ETHA) Claude Opus 4.7 score 1.8 · portfolio 0.20% · max possible 10.76%: Ethereum ETF (ETHA) Claude Fable 5 score -1.6 · portfolio -0.17% · max possible 10.76%: Ethereum ETF (ETHA)
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogleOIL34.62%1.26%+3.36 pp6.13%
Grok 4.5xAIOIL52.55%1.26%+1.28 pp8.21%
GPT-5.5OpenAIOIL51.44%1.26%+0.17 pp9.32%
Grok 4.3xAIENERGY31.04%1.26%-0.22 pp9.71%
Claude Opus 4.8AnthropicHEALTHCARE50.39%1.26%-0.87 pp10.36%
Claude Opus 4.7AnthropicHEALTHCARE50.20%1.26%-1.06 pp10.56%
Claude Fable 5AnthropicHEALTHCARE5-0.17%1.26%-1.43 pp10.92%
Portfolios behind the result

Portfolios Behind The Result

Compact allocation cards first, with the full searchable table below.

Google
Gemini 3.1 Pro Google
Crude Oil (USO) 40% Energy Sector (XLE) 30% Financials Sector (XLF) 30%
xAI
Grok 4.5 xAI
Crude Oil (USO) 30% Energy Sector (XLE) 25% Biotechnology (XBI) 20% Financials Sector (XLF) 15% +1 more
OpenAI
GPT-5.5 OpenAI
Crude Oil (USO) 30% Energy Sector (XLE) 20% Biotechnology (XBI) 25% Semiconductors (SMH) 15% +1 more
xAI
Grok 4.3 xAI
Energy Sector (XLE) 40% Financials Sector (XLF) 35% Healthcare Sector (XLV) 25%
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic
Healthcare Sector (XLV) 25% Financials Sector (XLF) 25% Energy Sector (XLE) 20% Utilities Sector (XLU) 15% +1 more
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic
Healthcare Sector (XLV) 30% Financials Sector (XLF) 25% Energy Sector (XLE) 20% US Low Volatility Equities (SPLV) 15% +1 more
Anthropic
Claude Fable 5 Anthropic
Healthcare Sector (XLV) 25% Energy Sector (XLE) 20% Financials Sector (XLF) 20% Biotechnology (XBI) 15% +1 more
ModelProviderPortfolioConfidenceProtocol
Gemini 3.1 Pro
google-gemini-3-1-pro
Google
Crude Oil (USO)40%Energy Sector (XLE)30%Financials Sector (XLF)30%
0.70
Portfolio round
Grok 4.5
xai-grok-4-5
xAI
Crude Oil (USO)30%Energy Sector (XLE)25%Biotechnology (XBI)20%Financials Sector (XLF)15%US Large-Cap Value (IWD)10%
0.42
Portfolio round
GPT-5.5
openai-gpt-5-5
OpenAI
Crude Oil (USO)30%Energy Sector (XLE)20%Biotechnology (XBI)25%Semiconductors (SMH)15%Healthcare Sector (XLV)10%
0.36
Portfolio round
Grok 4.3
xai-grok-4-3
xAI
Energy Sector (XLE)40%Financials Sector (XLF)35%Healthcare Sector (XLV)25%
0.55
Portfolio round
Claude Opus 4.8
anthropic-claude-opus-4-8
Anthropic
Healthcare Sector (XLV)25%Financials Sector (XLF)25%Energy Sector (XLE)20%Utilities Sector (XLU)15%Short-Term Treasury Bills (BIL)15%
0.50
Portfolio round
Claude Opus 4.7
anthropic-claude-opus-4-7
Anthropic
Healthcare Sector (XLV)30%Financials Sector (XLF)25%Energy Sector (XLE)20%US Low Volatility Equities (SPLV)15%Utilities Sector (XLU)10%
0.55
Portfolio round
Claude Fable 5
anthropic-claude-fable-5
Anthropic
Healthcare Sector (XLV)25%Energy Sector (XLE)20%Financials Sector (XLF)20%Biotechnology (XBI)15%US Large-Cap Value (IWD)20%
0.50
Portfolio round
Current live weekly round CB-2026-07-15-1W Scores after the 2026-07-22 close.
View current portfolios